|
ASK THE EXPERTS
The staff at Air Power USA is unmatched in our expertise on compressed
air systems and equipment, and we're happy to share some of that
expertise with you. Here, Don and Scott Van Ormer address some questions
we've received from our clients.
Do you have a question for the compressed air system specialists
at Air Power USA? If so, drop us a line. Our training programs and seminars and textbooks
and manuals may also be of help.
Constant speed compressor motors versus VSDs
I had been told that by replacing or changing all air compressor motors
to Variable Speed Drive (VSD), I will lower my electrical energy costs.
I have three 100 HP rotary screws and run all three. Should I replace
all these with VSDs? - Hammond, Ind.
Air Power USA Answer:
This question cannot be answered accurately without more data about
your load profile. To simply say that just installing new VSD drives
or a VSD compressor will lower your bill is "way off base". Here's
why:
| · |
A VSD is much more efficient as a trim unit than a
similar size constant speed version at loads from 20%
to about 75%. |
| · |
A variable displacement constant speed compressor
of similar size is more efficient than a VSD from loads
of about 75% to 100%. |
| · |
A VSD applied at full load will draw more power for
the same flow than a similar size constant speed (for
example, 4 to 6% in a lubricated rotary screw, or up
to 13% in an "oil-free" rotary screw. |
| · |
The key to correct application of an appropriate trim
compressor is identifying the "Load Profile" by shift
(including weekends and holidays) to estimate how many
hours the trim unit spends in the "sweet zone". |
|
We recommend holding off on taking any major action or spending money
on new equipment or piping without a review of the plant load and
system dynamics by trained personnel. We often have applied VSDs,
Variable Displacement Controlled Units, and sometimes both, when optimizing
a specific system and identified set of conditions.
Well applied the VSD is a great tool poorly applied it can make the
system worse.
Back to top
Problems holding steady pressure
We have three 200 HP oil-free rotary screw compressors installed to
run our plant. All three units run during production at 110 psig.
The pressure entering the receiver after the dryers is 80-85 psig.
We need a firm 82 psig to the process.
A company sold us two 3700-gallon air receivers and a pressure flow
controller to hold a steady 85 psig to the process at all times.
Our original installation also had two of the units loading and unloading
and loading every 20 to 30 seconds, which has caused motor and cooler
failures. Our piping is sized correctly - we used the same size pipe
as the opening size in the compressor discharge (3 inches). The header
is 4 inches.
We cannot hold 85 psig in the plant - the air is entering the controller
at 84 psig and the system is 78 psig. If the pressure gets up to 90
psig then we do have 85 psig in the system. Overall, we are back to
where we were - and bypassing the flow controller in order to run.
The compressors are still loading and unloading rapidly. We were told
this tank and controllers would fix our problems. We spent a great
deal of money to go nowhere. What is wrong? What can we do? - Hayward,
Calif.
Air Power USA Answer:
Without more data such as what we would acquire in a system review,
it is hard to pinpoint everything exactly. However, here are some
very accurate statements that may help:
| · |
Interconnecting piping from the compressor discharge
through the dryers to the system should be at a velocity
of 20 fps or less, never to exceed 30 fps to avoid turbulence-driven
back pressure. |
|
Each 200 HP compressor probably delivers about 830 acfm -- the 3-inch discharge
line has a velocity of 36 fps at 100 psig and 2490 scfm (all 3 units)
a velocity of 52.6 fps in the 4-inch pipe.
We will make an assumption that you are using straight "TEE" connections
to the header from the compressor. Each unit has to work its way past
the adjacent discharge to move through the piping. At these velocities
there will be a great deal of turbulence at each "TEE" connection
- particularly the last one.
All of this is apparently creating a total pressure loss of up to
26 psig at higher loads (you are not at full load due to the short
cycling). Assuming 5 psig is lost in the dryer, this leaves 20
psig or more due to high pipeline velocities, turbulence and
basic friction loss.
| · |
This high-pressure loss is the cause of the short
cycling. As soon as the compressor discharge senses
a 10-psid differential, it reacts by loading or unloading.
Adding the receiver storage - although large - does
no good as control storage after the pressure loss of
20 (+) psig. |
| · |
You could eliminate the short cycling by moving the
compressor control sensing point to the receiver - but
now the discharge pressure will rise to 120 psig or
more, which may overload the motor. If the motor can
handle it, your electrical power draw will increase
10 percent or more (1/2 percent per psig). This
type of action also can create a very bad safety situation.
Something of this nature should only be implemented
by trained professionals. |
| · |
A better action would be to correct the piping and
eliminate the wasted pressure loss. |
| · |
Check the actual pressure loss across the dryer at
full load with the same pressure gauge.
If it is more than 5 psig, we may want to review the
situation in more detail and ask for more data. |
| · |
Increasing the header size from 4 inches to 8 inches
will lower the maximum velocity from 52.6 fps to 15.9
fps. This will not only slow the air down, but also
act as storage. |
| · |
Even though the 3-inch discharge lines have a velocity
of 36 fps, if the "TEE" connections are changed to 30º
or 45º angle entry (angled towards the flow direction)
into the header, only frictional pressure loss will
apply. |
| · |
We would expect the air to reach the receivers now
at or near 100 psig, and consequently, air also would
reach the flow controller. This should give you a constant
85 psig to the system (properly adjusted), and also
allow you to perhaps lower the discharge pressure and
reduce the energy input. |
|
There are other things that could cause these problems:
| · |
Plugged or fouled dryer. |
| · |
Dead head piping. |
| · |
Improper sizing of the regulator part of the Flow
Controller: |
| · |
Regulators are sized to handle "flow rate", not "rate
of flow". |
| · |
If the Regulator is sized for 2500 scfm and the average
flow is 2000 scfm, it will regulate well during normal flow. If during the day you had a single event that used
500 scfm in 30 seconds. This is an additional 1000 cfm
to the rate of flow. Now the regulator is trying to
handle a 3000 scfm rate of flow during that event. The
regulator now becomes a choke and restricts the airflow. |
| · |
Your regulators appear to start "tracking" at somewhere
between 90 psig and 85 psig. This can be corrected by
a more effectively-sized regulator, depending on the
type and brand of Flow Controller. Regulation correctly
applied to a system can operate at a ½ psig differential
or less if required. |
|
For more information on piping and
turbulence-driven back pressure consult our book "Energy Savings in
Compressed Air".
Back to top
Full-voltage starts
Is it true that a full-voltage start on my compressor motors will
significantly increase my electrical bill compared to such soft starts
or Star Delta, Wye Delta, etc. because of the "power spike"? -
Waxahachie, Texas
Air Power USA Answer:
Generally this is not true, but it's often touted by over-zealous
marketing/sales personnel who use these soft-start controls on their
compressor packages.
The usual demand change is based on a high average kW
reading taken over a 15- to 30-minute time frame. The power spike
we are discussing is 1 to 2 seconds in duration. The soft starts generally
experience 50 to 70 percent of the power spike of Full Voltage, for
a duration of 3 to 7 seconds.
Back to top
Modulation control in lubricated rotary
screw compressors
Is it true that modulation control in lubricated rotary screw compressors
always is less efficient than two-step control ("on line-offline"
or "full on - full off")? - Muncie, Ind.
Air Power USA Answer:
Certainly not! At loads from 90 percent to 100 percent, the modulating
controls are almost always more power efficient than any two-step
in a lubricant-cooled rotary screw. Regardless of brand, two-step
control performance on these type units is absolutely dependent on
establishing enough idle time to allow the unit to reach "full blow
down" to the lowest kW in order to achieve "real power savings". Many
of these rotary types have blow-down times from 40 seconds to several
minutes depending on size and brand. Some of the newer, more modern
and engineered packages utilizing proper synthetic lubricant/coolant
have reduced these times to less than 10 seconds.
Ninety percent of the two-step rotaries we review in plant audits
do not reach full blow-down for any appreciable time
due to poor piping and/or not enough effective storage.
Here's some additional information on the subject:
| · |
Contrary to popular myths, 1 gallon
of effective storage per cfm of air is
not enough for proper part-load operation
of a two-step Capacity Control. |
| · |
The most power-efficient unloading control for lubricant-cooled
rotary compressors at loads from 75 to 100 percent
is the variable displacement. |
| · |
The most power-efficient unloading control for lubricant-cooled
rotary compressors from 20- to 75-percent loads is the
variable speed drive. |
|
All major changes to the system, including controls, should be preceded
by a full-system review by trained professionals.
Back to top
Lower discharge pressure for energy savings
Is it true that anytime I can lower discharge pressure of a compressor
I will save about ½% per psig lowered? - Appleton, Wis.
Air Power USA Answer:
This is true only on positive displacement compressors (vane, screw,
reciprocating, etc.) but not on dynamic (centrifugal, regenerative
blower, etc.). For example, when the discharge pressure rises on a
centrifugal compressor, the flow goes down but the power draw remains
about the same. Conversely, when the pressure is lower the flow increases
with the power at basically the same rate. This is while
operating outside the control band.
Back to top
Using amperage to calculate airflow
Can I calculate the airflow from my compressor by measuring the amperage
and the discharge pressure? - Dubuque, Iowa
Air Power USA Answer:
About the only time this works is when tracking full-load and no-load
amps on a two-step controlled unit. With these, we can calculate the
percentage at full load and percentage at no load to come up with
an average load.
If you know the input power on any positive displacement compressor
and knowing the type of compressor (type of unloading control, motor
data, etc.), you can come pretty close to estimating flow by measuring
input power.
Amperage is not a true reflection of power - kW is a power measurement.
With amperage, voltage and power factor, you can calculate kW. If
you measure these three (which are required) with a hand-held motor
analyzer, you will get kW and can calculate probable motor efficiency
(ME).
Power measurement in any form is not a good estimating tool for centrifugal
compressors except to indicate whether the unit is in turndown or
not. To accurately estimate the flow without a flowmeter, you need
the original performance curve if it is available, along with the
inlet and discharge pressures and inlet temperatures. Even with a
flowmeter, we usually estimate as close as possible in order to double-check.
Back to top
Inlet guide vanes on a centrifugal compressor
Is it true that inlet guide vanes on a centrifugal compressor will
increase the amount of "turn down"? - Milford, Mass.
Air Power USA Answer:
No. Inlet guide vanes (IGV) used instead of an inlet butterfly valve
(IBV) will not increase the amount of turndown. They will improve
specific power (efficiency or scfm/kW) of the compressor throughout
the turndown range.
Many people, including us at Air Power, believe the IGV allows much
smoother turndown, enabling and encouraging the operator to set the
controls to full-effective turndown. For best performance, controls
should be reset seasonably unless you are running a control system
that calculates inlet conditions and changes in its program and automatically
readjust itself.
Back to top
Loose foundations
My 350 HP XLE has come loose on the foundation. We have installed
new hold-down bolts and clamps, but they don't hold. What should I
do? -Tulsa, Okla.
Air Power USA Answer:
Without seeing the installation, it is hard to give an exact recommendation,
But here are some key thoughts:
|
The only way to reset the unit on the foundation is to move
the compressor, clean the old grout off the foundation, and
reinstall new grout and the unit. |
| · |
This can't be done if the foundation is crumbling, cracked
and/or soaked with oil. If any of these conditions exist, the
foundation will have to be removed down to solid, clean concrete
and then rebuilt back up before regrouting. |
| · |
Another option is to cut the foundation down to floor level
and install a proper "inertia base" instead of a new foundation.
Professionals should be called in to review this option. |
| · |
Be sure you are not in Inlet or Discharge piping "critical
length" (to avoid). This data is available in the instruction
manual. If you can't find this data, we have most of the engineering
sheets and can help you if you send us the compressor model
(ie., Bore, Stroke) and RPM. These "critical lengths" can also
be calculated with some additional information. |
Back to top
Conflicting data on inlet and discharge
piping
We are installing new 1000HP centrifugal compressors in our plant.
We have received conflicting data on the proper material for inlet
and discharge piping! The OEM recommends stainless steel, but the
engineering firm wants to use galvanized schedule 40 pipe. What do
you say? - Birmingham, Ala.
Air Power USA Answer:
The question of galvanized piping comes up often in compressed air
system piping, as does the question of using stainless steel instead
of schedule 40 black iron for the nominal 100 psig air systems. Let's
look at inlet and discharge piping separately.
Inlet Piping:
The proper inlet pipe brings the air from the filter to the compressor
with no pressure loss and should not create operational problems with
any type of self-contamination on the inside. It is important to realize
that the ambient inlet air condition may well dictate the selection
of one type of pipe over another.
Galvanized inlet piping has the advantage of resisting
corrosion better than standard iron pipe. However, over time when
the corrosion does set in, the galvanizing material then peels off.
The inlet pipe is now a producer of potentially very damaging, solid
contaminants between the filter and the compressor. This would be
particularly dangerous to the mechanical integrity of a centrifugal
compressor.
During high-humidity weather it is quite conceivable
that condensation will form in the inlet pipe (therefore, the OEM
installation manual recommends a drain valve be installed on the pipe
before the inlet). Condensation in the pipe will obviously accelerate
the time frame before the coating breaks down. This time frame is
dependent upon where the thinnest portion of the coating is applied.
Stainless steel inlet pipe is the best possible material
for such large-diameter, low-pressure inlet air, as long as it is
installed properly and the inside is properly cleaned.
There are also many grades of plastic material suitable
for inlet air piping.
Summary: We recommend either stainless steel or proper plastic-type
material for inlet piping and do not recommend galvanized
piping.
Discharge Piping:
Here we have more complex considerations:
| · |
The discharge air from the compressors can be at 250
to 350ºF (for centrifugal, oil-free rotary screw and
reciprocating types), or from 200 to 220ºF (for lubricant-cooled
rotary screw compressors), so the pipe must be able
to withstand those temperatures. |
| · |
Even if there is an aftercooler that drops the temperature
to 100ºF, consideration must be given as to the consequences
if the aftercooler were to fail. |
| · |
Compressed-air-generated condensate tends to be acidic.
In oil-free compressors (such as centrifugals and oil-free
rotary screws), it is usually very aggressive. |
| · |
The basic objective of the interconnecting piping
is to deliver the air to the filter and dryers and then
to the production air system with little or no pressure
loss, and certainly with little or no self contamination. |
| · |
Galvanized piping will have the same problems once
it begins to peel as we described on the inlet application.
In all probability, due to the aggressive acid characteristics
of the condensate, the galvanized coating life may be
much shorter. |
|
Regardless of the plastic type manufactures claim, we never recommend
any plastic type material for interconnecting and distribution header
piping. Most of these materials carry cautions not to be exposed to
temperatures over 200ºF and to avoid any types of oil or lubricants.
Here again stainless steel is our number one recommendation for the
interconnecting piping from the compressor to the filter/dryers when
the compressed air is oil free. It will obviously resist corrosion
much better than standard schedule 40 black iron. Some other considerations:
·
|
Most areas will allow schedule 10 stainless steel
in lieu of schedule 40 black iron. |
| · |
For the same diameter pipe, stainless steel will
be much lighter and easier to handle usually lowering
the labor cost. |
| · |
For welded connections, stainless steel usually
just requires one bead, while black iron pipe usually
requires three beads (Weld-fill-cover). This should
also lower the labor cost. |
| · |
Stainless steel does not usually seal well when
threaded. It will do much better with Victaulic type
connections when welding is not practical. |
|
|